Legal Opinion

American Woolen Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 4, 1937No. Nos. 42459. 42904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of the court held that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was conclusive as to the amount of plaintiff’s liability for the taxes of 1922 and 1923. Contending that this holding was erroneous, the plaintiff has filed a motion for new trial and reargument.

It is urged that plaintiff is entitled to reargument for the reason that the question decided by the court was not argued on the submission of the case. This is an error. It was explicitly stated on pages 114 and 115 of defendant’s brief, and in any event would not be sufficient ground for a new trial although it might be a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Peerless Woolen Mills v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Commissioner v. Newport Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Lenny v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956
  4. United States v. CaponeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Merrill v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API