Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Dix

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 31, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is an application by notice of motion for an order fixing the reasonable fees of the attorney who formerly represented the administrator, and for the substitution of a new attorney for the estate. There is no pending proceeding in this court in which it would be permissible to effect the substitution. The petitioner is evidently unaware that in the absence of a pending proceeding he is not obliged to ask for a substitution of attorneys, but may discharge his attorney at any time. The proceeding to fix attorney’s fees should not have been commenced by a notice of motion to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  2. In re the Estate of MosessohnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. Gentry v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. In re the Estate of FaganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  4. In re the Estate of FantelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API