People v. Wander
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Irrespective of whether the police conduct in this case is viewed as something less than "interrogation”, it is obvious that the defendant’s request to remain silent was not scrupulously honored, requiring as a consequence the suppression of his oral statement. (People v Grant, 45 NY2d 366, 375-376; see *726People v Buxton, 44 NY2d 33, 37.) Given the nature and quantum of proof offered at trial, it cannot be said that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that this error did not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. FerroNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. DE JESUS (RAYMOND)New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. KinnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. AponteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.