Legal Opinion

Estate of Schoenkerman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowleR, J.

Goldie Sucher and Ethel Sucher filed claims against the estate of Bern S. Schoenkerman, deceased. The claimants were mother-in-law and sister-in-law, respectively, of the decedent. Both claims are for services rendered to the decedent during a series of years in caring for the decedent’s home and children. After continuance of the service for ten years the decedent executed and delivered to the mother-in-law his promissory note for $500 and to the sister-in-law his like note for $1,500. The claimants in their claims applied the amount of the notes upon .the aggregates claimed, and demanded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Park Falls State Bank v. FordyceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Odell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Onsrud v. PaulsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jax v. JaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Krause v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Eli Environmental Contractors, Inc. v. 435 Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. Waukesha State Bank v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Grueneberg v. BrieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API