Martin v. Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Eighteen years later, in the summer of 1983, Marasco demolished the old garage as a step towards replacing it in much the same location, but without encroaching upon the way he and the Martins had created. He was advised he needed approval of the board of appeals. The board granted Marasco a special permit and variance. A judge of the Superior Court, after hearing an appeal under G. L. c. 40A, § 17, found that the board had acted within its authority and that no modification of its decision was required.
Under zoning regulations applicable when the action was brought, no structure might be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warren v. Zoning Board of Appeals of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Gamache v. Town of AcushnetMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Raia v. Board of Appeals of North ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Berliner v. FeldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Derby Refining Co. v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Gordon v. Zoning Board of Appeals of LeeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Bartlett v. Board of Appeals of LakevilleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Tamerlane Realty Trust v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.