Legal Opinion

Lemelson v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 3, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01202Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 CAROLYN LEMELSON, et al. CASE NO. C22-1202JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion 17 to dismiss Plaintiffs Carolyn Lemelson and Pacific Doodles, LLC’s (“Pacific Doodles”) 18 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) complaint. (Mot. (Dkt. ## 4, 5-11); Reply (Dkt. # 10).) 19 Plaintiffs oppose Wells Fargo’s motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 9).) The court has considered the 20 21 1 Wells Fargo…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API