Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 17, 1974No. 1828-1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment on a jury verdict for defendants. The controlling assignment of error concerns the court’s refusal to grant a new trial based on a claimed material false answer to a question asked by plaintiff’s attorney of a prospective juror during voir dire examination of the jury.

The facts here material are these: Plaintiff, a 20-year-old single woman from California, while vacationing in Washington, was riding as a passenger in the right front seat of a Volvo sports car. While so riding, she was struck by a rock crashing through the windshield. As a result she sustained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Robinson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hill v. GTE Directories Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. State v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. TiganoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API