Smith v. Kent
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment on a jury verdict for defendants. The controlling assignment of error concerns the court’s refusal to grant a new trial based on a claimed material false answer to a question asked by plaintiff’s attorney of a prospective juror during voir dire examination of the jury.
The facts here material are these: Plaintiff, a 20-year-old single woman from California, while vacationing in Washington, was riding as a passenger in the right front seat of a Volvo sports car. While so riding, she was struck by a rock crashing through the windshield. As a result she sustained…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Robinson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hill v. GTE Directories Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. TiganoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.