Legal Opinion

Gritz v. Gritz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1939No. Appeal, 184PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The proceeds of two insurance policies upon the life of Harry Gritz were paid to his mother as the named beneficiary. His widow filed this suit in equity, seeking to establish a parol trust in her favor of the face amount of one of the policies. From the decree dismissing the bill, she has appealed.

The bill avers, inter alia, that on several occasions prior to their marriage, the insured stated to the plaintiff that he intended to name her beneficiary of one of his two policies; that shortly after their marriage, and while confined in the hospital with his fatal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  2. Washington's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Hamill v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Donithen v. Independent Order of ForestersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Broadrick v. BroadrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Volkwein v. Volkwein, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Costa v. CostaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. GinsburgDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. WillsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Cipriani, Marie v. Sun Life Insurance Co. Of America v. Cipriani, Margaret. Appeal of Sun Life Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API