Legal Opinion

Hinman v. Eakins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant, before a justice, on a declaration containing one special count for the failure to accept certain oil barrels contracted for. Appended to this was the following conclusion: “ One other count for the sale of said barrels, and delivery of part, and refusal of defendant to receive same as agreed upon; also the common counts.” This brief summary could hardly be held a special count, but is good as to the common counts, which, in a justice’s court, are seldom set out at length, as their purport is always the same.

To this Eakins pleaded in abatement, that the undertaking…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StellwagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Larkin v. Mitchell & Rowland Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McKnight v. LowitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API