Ulman v. Ritter
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia
Rule against William L. Ritter to show canse why he should not be punished for contempt in violating an injunction. •
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
On the 22d day of July, last, IJi-man & Iaeger presented their bill to me, at chambers, praying for an injunction to restrain the Elkhorn <fe Sandy River Land Trust from cutting and removing timber from the lands set out and described in the bill, and claimed by complainants. On the same day the injunction was allowed as prayed for; restraining the defendants, their agents and servants, from the further cutting and removing of timber from the land claimed by complainants, upon their entering into bond, with good security, to pay all damages and costs awarded against…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ritter v. UlmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1897
- Tornanses v. MelsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Blake v. NesbetDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1905
- Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. McKelvey Hughes Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.