Legal Opinion
Tornanses v. Melsing
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1901No. Nos. 634, 636PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The proceedings now before the court in the above-entitled cases grow out of the alleged disobedience by one Alexander McKenzie of certain writs of supersedeas issued out of this court upon the order of Honorable William W. Morrow, one of its judges. They have been argued and submitted together, atnd will be so considered. Each case originated in the United States district court for the Second division of the district of Alaska, of which Arthur H. Noyes is the judge, George V. Borchsenius the clerk, and C. E. Dickey a deputy clerk. Placer-mining claim known as “No. 10…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The Farmers'loan and Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Winthrop Iron Co. v. MeekerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Rubert Hermanos, Inc. v. People of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Tornanses v. MelsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Blackmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Anderson v. ComptoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.