Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Booker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 2008No. 1070376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Booker petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming the Chambers Circuit Court's order denying his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. We issued the writ of certiorari to review whether Booker's claim alleging that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his convictions is precluded from appellate review. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm, on a different rationale, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Michael Booker pleaded guilty to two counts of capital…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte EversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ex Parte MutrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Jones v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Anderson v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API