Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Julio E. Roman v. John Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2004No. 02-3253Published

1ConcurrenceGibbons, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result in this case and agree with much of the majority opinion’s *330reasoning. I write separately to note two points.

First, whether the petitioner is a detained alien or a federal prisoner, the weight of authority supports a determination that the Attorney General is not a proper respondent in petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 691 (1st Cir.2000) (finding that normally the Attorney General is not the proper respondent in alien habeas cases and noting that a number of courts have held that the Attorney General is not a proper custodian for purposes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Yi v. MaugansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Sanders v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Jones v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Elbert Blango v. Richard R. Thornburgh J. Michael Quinlan Gary L. Henman Mayor, Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API