Julio E. Roman v. John Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1ConcurrenceGibbons, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result in this case and agree with much of the majority opinion’s *330reasoning. I write separately to note two points.
First, whether the petitioner is a detained alien or a federal prisoner, the weight of authority supports a determination that the Attorney General is not a proper respondent in petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 691 (1st Cir.2000) (finding that normally the Attorney General is not the proper respondent in alien habeas cases and noting that a number of courts have held that the Attorney General is not a proper custodian for purposes…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Yi v. MaugansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sanders v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Jones v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Elbert Blango v. Richard R. Thornburgh J. Michael Quinlan Gary L. Henman Mayor, Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.