Legal Opinion
Sandri v. Byram
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1929No. 5054PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, herein called the plaintiff, Joseph San-chi, administrator of the estate of Wazino Sandri, sued Byram, Potter, and Brundago, receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, for damages for the alleged wrongful death of his intestate. On the trial, at the close of the evidence, a motion by defendants for a directed verdict was sustained. Plaintiff sued out a writ of error. The case was brought under and falls within Federal Employers’ Liability Act, April 22, 1908, c. 149, § 1, 35 Stat. 65 (title 45, c. 2, § 51, U. S. C. [45 USCA §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Erie R. v. SchomerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Cowen v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Christie v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.