Brown v. Kimmel
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal prom, Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas.— Hon. II. Q-. Wilson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.
The point discussed by the counsel in this case is whether, in actions on stated accounts or insimul *431computassent, the rules of evidence in regard to such actions are confined to dealings between merchants. That question was decided by this court in Shepard v. Bank of Missouri, (15 Mo. 143,) and that decision was recognized in the recent decision in Powell v. P. R. R. Co., 65 Mo. 658. The rule of evidence no doubt originated in mercantile dealings and the reported cases usually relate to such dealings, but the principle seems to have been extended to all cases where the relation of debtor and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Powell v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- White v. HamptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Shepard v. Bank of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bassinger v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Chinn v. LewinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- McKeen v. Boatmen's BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. B. F. Coombs & Brother Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Newberger v. FriedeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.