Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cox v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 2006No. CR 05-080PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Justice.

On February 24, 2003, appellant, Robert Allen Cox, pleaded guilty to the following: (1) possessing drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine and possessing methamphetamine with intent to deliver in case number CR-2000-173; (2) possessing methamphetamine and possessing drug paraphernalia in case number CR-2001-17; and, (3) possessing methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possessing drug paraphernalia in case number CR-2002-81. He was placed on probation for a period of four years and fined $1500 for each of the charges on possession of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. State v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Neeve v. City of Caddo ValleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Glaze v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Carroll v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Flemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Neely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API