Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Ellis County. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKHOHT, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by Lee H. Hughes, administrator of the estate of H. H. Bawlins, against Eli Bolden, Henry Bolden, Mary Bolden, a non compos mentis, Bettie Bolden, Amos Nichols, Mary Nichols, a minor, Martha Giles and her husband, Bobert Giles, Owen Watters and Willie Watters, minors, to recover of said defendants the sum of $575, with interest and attorneys’ fees, evidenced by a certain promissory note executed by Bobert Bolden to H. H. Bawlins about August 30, 1881, and that said promissory note was given in payment, of the purchase money of fifty acres…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stone Land & Cattle Co. v. BoonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Estes v. BrowningTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  3. White v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gardener v. Griffith, ExecutorsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Young v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wier v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Gantt v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Bain v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Pena v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. McFaddin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API