Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Mussoline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeal, No. 434Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Cohen:

This Court has repeatedly stated that matters not raised in or considered by the court below cannot be considered on appeal for the first time. Wynnewood Civic Association v. Lower Merion Township Board of Adjustment, 406 Pa. 413, 419, 179 A. 2d 649 (1962); Rome Township Referendum Recount Case, 397 Pa. 331, 155 A. 2d 361 (1959); Muse-Art Corporation v. Philadelphia, 373 Pa. 329, 95 A. 2d 542 (1953); Prenzel v. Apex Hosiery Co., Inc., 299 Pa. 17, 148 Atl. 915 (1930), and numerous other cases. Despite this well settled principle, the majority opinion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wynnewood Civic Ass'n v. Lower Merion Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Muse-Art Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Prenzel, Tr. v. Apex Hosiery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Rome Township Referendum Recount CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API