Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Roche

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

It appears from the allegations of the original bill that the plaintiff in the original suit was the owner of a horse known as “Nicholas J. Hayes,” and that the defendant, who was engaged in the business of buying and selling horses, owned a horse known as “The Whippet.” The parties on August 29,1927, made an even exchange of the horses under which the plaintiff acquired possession and title to the horse “Whippet,” and the defendant acquired title and took possession of the horse “Nicholas J. Hayes.” The defendant in the original suit on September 3, 1927, returned the horse *64he had received…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craig v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Manning v. Woodlawn Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olsen v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Les v. AlibozekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Counelis v. AndresonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Bosse v. Leonard & Barrows Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API