Legal Opinion

Deering v. Stites

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Special Judge Faubest

Affirming.

The National Bank of Kentucky, hereinafter called the bank, was a national bank engaged in the banking-business in Louisville, Ky., ■ and the Louisville Trust Company, hereinafter called the trust company, was a ■corporation, organized under the laws of Kentucky and doing a general trust business in that city. Some of the stockholders of these organizaztions conceived that it would be to their mutual interests to effect a close cooperation between the two institutions by pooling their 'stock.

With this in view, a written agreement of date…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Young v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Stone v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. GreenwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  2. Powers v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Karr's Adm'r v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API