Legal Opinion
Overstreet v. Greenwell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 16, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
On October 7, 1964, appellant, Elgie Overstreet, and appellee, Phillip Green-well, entered into a written contract by which Greenwell granted Overstreet the exclusive right to install and maintain, for a period of ten years, coin-operated amusement and/or vending machines in certain premises owned or leased by Greenwell. When Overstreet attempted to place his machines in this property Greenwell refused to let him do so but instead permitted a competing operator to place machines therein.
On January 15, 1965, Overstreet sued Greenwell for breach of contract claiming $26,000.00…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sloan v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Mast v. Sapp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Herpolsheimer v. ChristopherNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Hays v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Cohn v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Polk v. WimsattCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
- City of Louisville v. Louisville Professional Firefighters Ass'n, Local Union No. 345 Ex Rel. GnagieKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Oleg Finefter v. Jane DoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020