United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Gentile
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
In undertaking to decide this workmen’s compensation appeal we find ourselves in the same position as the superior court judge, Hon. Winebert Dan Flexer, who remanded the matter to the state board. He concluded his opinion thusly: "This court finds that the board’s award in this case does not contain the findings of fact required by law, and that the court therefore is unable to intelligently review the remainder of the cause and those contentions therein that the board applied an erroneous theory of law in making its award.” (R. 128).
Judge Flexer ruled on this case in such a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Hoffman v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Dudley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Century Mortgage Investors v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Leasing International, Inc. v. PlemonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- General Motors Corporation v. PeeplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Carrie v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.