Legal Opinion

May v. Retarides

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 8, 2004No. AC 24337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Under General Statutes § 45a-98 (a) (3), a Probate Court is authorized to “determine title . . . to any . . . intangible property that constitutes, or may constitute, all or part of any . . . decedent’s estate . . . .’’In this case, the intangible property consists of the proceeds of a homeowners’ insurance policy that were paid as compensation for the loss of personal property in a fire that occurred on the property of the decedent. The principal issue is whether the estate has *288a priority claim to recover the decedent’s losses or whether all of the proceeds must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galgano v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Century Indemnity Co. v. KofskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Tuxis-Ohr's, Inc. v. GherloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. May v. RetaridesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. May v. RetaridesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Northeast Distribution, Inc. v. Premier Logistics Services Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API