Legal Opinion
United Services Life Ins. v. Farr
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 21, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This is an action of interpleader brought by an insurance company under 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(26), naming as defendants the insured’s mother and aunt, who were the original beneficiaries of a policy of life insurance, and the widow of the insured, whom he later tried to substitute as a beneficiary. The proceeds of the policy ($5,-008.90) have been deposited by the insurance company with the Clerk of this Court.
On November 1, 1941, Edward J. Gallagher, a First Lieutenant in the 165th Infantry, Company D, while stationed at Fort McClellan, Alabama, applied for a $5,000…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diana Weddington Spiess v. United Services Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
- Jacobus v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950