Legal Opinion

Christopher Drennen v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 28, 2024No. 1:09-cv-10179Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-10179-GAO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. CHRISTOPHER DRENNEN, Relator, v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER May 28, 2024 O’TOOLE, D.J. This dispute over attorneys’ fees and costs arises from the settlement of a qui tam action brought against the defendant, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. pursuant to the False Claims Act (the “FCA”),

37 U.S.C. § 3729

et seq. The action was filed by the relator, Christopher Drennen, in 2009, alleging…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Rose Bordanaro v. John McLeod Appeal of City of Everett, Edward Connolly, and Donald BontempoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API