Legal Opinion

John Deere Co. v. Butler County Implement, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 3, 1982No. 53,898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an interpleader action brought by plaintiff John Deere Company. The subject matter of the action is excess proceeds from the sale of repossessed inventory of farm equipment. Said inventory had been repossessed by John Deere under a floor-plan agreement after defendant Butler County Implement, a John Deere dealer, defaulted on payments due John Deere. The dispute at trial and before us is among the various defendants, each of which has asserted a competing claim for the funds. The Kansas Departments of Revenue and Human Resources…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Mauritz-Wells Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Taylor v. Department of Health & EnvironmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. State v. Mauritz-Wells Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Fallston Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1944

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Paulman v. Gateway Venture Partners III, L.P. (In re Filtercorp, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Maxl Sales Company v. Critiques, Inc., D/B/A Decorators Warehouse, and Eric C. Rajala, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re Filtercorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. State Board of Nursing v. RuebkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API