Legal Opinion

United States v. Ball

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 23, 2013No. Criminal Action No. 05-100 (RWR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge.

Defendants Antwuan Ball, Desmond Thurston, and Joseph Jones were convicted of distribution of cocaine base (“crack”) and are currently appealing their sentences in the court of appeals. The defendants moved for release pending their appeal. Because the defendants have not met their burden to show that they pose no flight risk or danger to the community during release or that their appeal raises a substantial question likely to result in a reversal, the defendants’ motion will be denied.

BACKGROUND

Eighteen people were indicted for a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Kilgore v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API