Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 17, 2015No. Criminal No. 2005-0100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge

Defendant Joseph Jones moves pro se under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) for a reduction of his sentence for distributing crack cocaine claiming that the sentencing guidelines range upon which his sentence was based was later lowered and made retroactive to his case by Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”). Pet. for Reduction of Sentence under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“Defs Mot. to Reduce”) at 1. The government opposes Jones’ motion arguing that Jones is not eligible for a reduced sentence under Amendment 750 because his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Brown v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Joseph JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. NoriDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API