People v. Knightbent
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, J.
In this case, the services of an appointed counsel and a deputy attorney general, together with three justices and staff of this court, are applied to the resolution of a single issue: whether the court’s order imposing a $34 fine on defendant was proper under Penal Code section 1202.5, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 1202.5(a)). Defendant argues the court erred and the fine must be reduced to $10.
We shall conclude that indeed the court erred, but the error benefitted defendant and, as the Attorney General correctly asserts, the court should have imposed a total fine of $66.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. CastellanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SencionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.