Legal Opinion

People v. Knightbent

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 2010No. C061208PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, J.

In this case, the services of an appointed counsel and a deputy attorney general, together with three justices and staff of this court, are applied to the resolution of a single issue: whether the court’s order imposing a $34 fine on defendant was proper under Penal Code section 1202.5, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 1202.5(a)). Defendant argues the court erred and the fine must be reduced to $10.

We shall conclude that indeed the court erred, but the error benefitted defendant and, as the Attorney General correctly asserts, the court should have imposed a total fine of $66.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. SencionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API