Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1899PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Brazos. Tried below before Hon. W. G. Taliaferro.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

—This is a proceeding which was instituted in the County Court by the appellee to probate the will and codicils attached thereto, of David McIntosh, deceased. It was alleged in the application that the will could not be produced by the applicant.

The application was contested by Mary McIntosh, the surviving wife of the alleged testator.

A judgment was entered in the County Court admitting the will to probate, from which an appeal was prosecuted by the contestant to the District Court, where a like judgment was entered, from which we have this appeal.

It seems to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Jackson v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Horn v. . PullmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Betts v. Jackson ex dem. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Salinas v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Pullen v. RussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Clark v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Aschenbeck v. AschenbeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Lowery v. Saunders, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API