Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. McReavy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1990No. 80422, (Calendar No. 9)Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevin, J.

McReavy was convicted of armed robbery,1 kidnapping,2 and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony,3 and was sentenced as *223a third offender.4 The issue presented concerns the substantive5 use of McReavy’s failure during post-arrest, post -Miranda6 interrogation to respond to particular questions concerning his involvement in the robbery and kidnapping.

The Court of Appeals reversed McReavy’s conviction on the ground that testimony and argument concerning McReavy’s failure to answer violated the rule stated in People v Bobo, 390 Mich 355; 212 NW2d 190 (1973). Because we conclude…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API