United Indurated Fibre Co. of New Jersey v. Whippany Manuf'g Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
This was a suit in equily by the United Indurated Fibre Company of Jersey City and others against the Whippany Manufacturing Company and others for alleged infringement of certain patents. The cause was heard on a motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The bill filed in this case asks for an injunction against the Whippany Company and others, the defendants therein, prohibiting the manufacture by them of indurated' fibre ware, because the method used by them infringes upon the rights of the eomplainanis, as’protected by patent No. 2(>7,á¡)2 (reissue Ko. 10,282), and also because in the forming of the articles the defendants infringe claim 7 of another patent issued to Martin L. Keyes (No. 342.009), both of which patents are field by the complainants under valid assignments. The claims said to be infringed are as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Electric Manuf'g Co. v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- American Paper Pail & Box Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
- Tannage Patent Co. v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1896
- Mallory Manuf'g Co. v. HickokU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.