Legal Opinion

Tannage Patent Co. v. Adams

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a suit in equity by the Tannage Pateut Company against William W. Adams and others for alleged infringement of letters patent Nos. 291,784 and 291,785, issued January .8, 1884, to Augustus ¡áchultz, for processes of “tawing- hides and skins.” The cause was heard on motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction.

Read the full summary

This was a suit in equity by the Tannage Pateut Company against William W. Adams and others for alleged infringement of letters patent Nos. 291,784 and 291,785, issued January .8, 1884, to Augustus ¡áchultz, for processes of “tawing- hides and skins.” The cause was heard on motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction. Each patent contains a single claim, as follows: No. 291,784: “The within-described process for tawing hides and skins, said process consisting in subjecting the hides or skins to the action of compounds of metallic salts, such as a solution of bichromate of potash, and then…

1Opinion of the Court

AOHESOH, Circuit Judge.

The Schultz patents were sustained by the circuit court of appeals for this circuit in the case of Patent Co. v. Zahn, 28 U. S. App. 620, 17 C. C. A. 552, 70 Fed. 1003, after bona ñde and protracted litigation upon the merits. In that case the validity of the patents was most vigorously contested. The proofs were voluminous, and the defense was conducted by experienced counsel. The pendency of that suit was well known to the trade most interested in defeating the patents. It is, then, a fair presumption that the defense there made against the validity of the patents was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit & Insurance v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
  2. Tannage Patent Co. v. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
  3. Tannage Patent Co. v. DonallanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford Morocco Co. v. Tannage Patent Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  2. Tannage Patent Co. v. DonallanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
  3. Cohen v. Stephenson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  4. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co. v. Hackensack Improvement CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  5. United Indurated Fibre Co. of New Jersey v. Whippany Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API