Cox v. Hughes
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The complaint alleges that on or about the second day of January, 1906, plaintiff executed a certain written instrument, which is set forth in the complaint and which is designated, and in fact is, a power of attorney. Therein the defendant, A. S. Hughes, was authorized, among other things, “to fill in, execute or complete, any sale or assignment of wages or salary, claim or demand now due or to become due me from any future employer, person, firm or corporation, to the extent of my indebtedness to the said Star Loan Company, which said sale or assignment may date from the time of my said new…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- Norton v. WhiteheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Edwards v. PetersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Walker v. RichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- National Automobile Insurance v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.