Legal Opinion

Pantusco v. Wiley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 2005No. A05A0500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Frank Pantusco appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment disposing of his counterclaim. Because Pantusco has failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

George Wiley and Jim Manowski sued their former employer, Georgia Attachment, Inc.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Phoenix Airline Services, Inc. v. Metro Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  3. Bone Construction Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Amason v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slaick v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. All Star, Inc. v. FellowsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. In re Estate of SiegCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. MARINER HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY v. SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API