Slaick v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Nancy Slaick appeals from the superior court’s order declaring that a deed transferring Katie Day’s interest in real property to Slaick was void because it lacked “valid and valuable consideration.” For the reasons set forth below, we reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand this case to the trial court to make findings with regard to the issues of fraud and after-acquired title.
The record shows that the administrator of Day’s estate, Emmett J. Arnold, filed an action for declaratory judgment in probate court against Slaick to determine if Slaick received a valid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- In re Estate of LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Graham v. TallentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Crowell v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- McDonald v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hong Investments, LLC v. SarsfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Slaick v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Alacrity Holdings 6, LLC v. PopliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023
- CHAD RICHARD HENDERSON v. EDNA THOMAS FISHERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- Harvey H. Walker v. Barbara Jean FoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.