Legal Opinion
United States v. Ma
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 12, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00145Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:22-CV-145-RP § DONGXIN MA and MA ACUPUNCTURE § CENTER PC, § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff United States of America’s (the “United States”) motion to enforce settlement agreement, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 39). Defendants Dongxin Ma (“Ma”) and Ma Acupuncture Center PC (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a response in opposition. (Dkt. 42). The United States then filed a reply, (Dkt. 43), and Defendants,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mid-South Towing Company v. Har-Win, Inc. v. Okc Corporation Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Cia Anon Venezolana De Navegacion v. Frank L. Harris and Pate Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Bell v. SchexnayderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.