Legal Opinion

Van Pelt v. Corwine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit by Corwine against Van Pelt for work and labor. Pleas, the general issue, payment, accord and satisfaction, and some others that need not be mentioned. The cause was tried by a jury, and there was a verdict, and judgment upon it, for a fraction over 100 dollars.

There was a motion made to arrest the judgment, and for a new trial.

A demurrer was sustained to certain pleas.

The work and labor were performed by the plaintiff for the defendant while a minor, and under a special contract not fulfilled.

The motion in arrest of judgment was an affirmance of the verdict upon the evidence, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harney v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Dallas v. HollingsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Cheek v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Whitworth v. BallardIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hays v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API