Legal Opinion

Laurens v. Rush

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1967No. 42860PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

This case presents the question of the duty owed to a social guest of an owner or occupier of land—a difficult problem in semantics. While a rose is a rose, the invited are not always invitees. “ ‘Invitation’ is today a much discredited word, if only because a private social guest is invited, and yet is not in the legal sense an ‘invitee.’ ” Prosser, Business Visitors and Invitees, 26 Minn.- L. Rev. 573, 585.

“If plaintiff is a social guest in defendant’s home, the great weight of Anglo-American authority classifies him as a bare licensee, even though he was expressly invited.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Stanton v. GrubbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Hall v. CappsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Campbell v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Patterson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Higginbotham v. WinbornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Ramsey v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Frankel v. AntmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Wade v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API