Laurens v. Rush
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
This case presents the question of the duty owed to a social guest of an owner or occupier of land—a difficult problem in semantics. While a rose is a rose, the invited are not always invitees. “ ‘Invitation’ is today a much discredited word, if only because a private social guest is invited, and yet is not in the legal sense an ‘invitee.’ ” Prosser, Business Visitors and Invitees, 26 Minn.- L. Rev. 573, 585.
“If plaintiff is a social guest in defendant’s home, the great weight of Anglo-American authority classifies him as a bare licensee, even though he was expressly invited.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Stanton v. GrubbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hall v. CappsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Campbell v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by27 opinions
- Patterson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Higginbotham v. WinbornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Ramsey v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Frankel v. AntmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Wade v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.