Hall v. Capps
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
Although the plaintiff here sought to recover in one count on the theory that he was both an implied invitee and *151an express invitee of the defendant occupant of the premises, there was no special demurrer on the ground of duplicity, and the question stated in the 4th paragraph of the syllabus must.be decided.
While the authorities are not uniform, their overwhelming weight is to the effect that an express invitation, like one implied, does not give to the recipient the legal status of an invitee, unless his visit is in some way connected with the business in which the occupant is engaged. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Laurens v. RushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Higginbotham v. WinbornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Stanton v. GrubbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- MacKenna v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- AMERICAN LEGION &C. v. SimontonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.