Legal Opinion

J. S. McCall & Sons v. Roemer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1916No. 5678PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Bastrop County Court; J. B. Price, Judge. Action by J. S. McCall & Sons against E. Roemer and another. From a judgment in favor of the named defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

J. S. McCall & Sons sued E. Roemer and L. Y. Bigham on an account for goods, wares, and merchandise alleged to have been sold to said Bigham at the instance and request of Roemer and upon the credit of the latter and in order to enable Bigham to make a crop on Roemer’s farm during the year 1914. Bigham, in open court, admitted the justness of the account. Roemer, in addition to a general denial, specially denied that he requested plaintiffs to sell Big-ham any goods or that he promised to pay the account, and, in addition, plead the statute of frauds. The jury, pursuant to the peremptory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strong v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huling v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Pearce v. Supreme Lodge, Knights & Ladies of HonorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Thorne v. DashiellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Carr v. Pecos Valley State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Toole v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API