Legal Opinion

Carr v. Pecos Valley State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1916No. 633PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Reeves County ; W. A. Hudson, Judge. Action by the Pecos Valley State Bank against H. V. Carr. Judgment on perémp-tory instruction for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In this case, appellees sought to recover upon certain notes executed by H'. V. Carr and R. I. Carr, together with foreclosure of deed in trust given to secure the payment of the notes. Appellant, I-I. V. Carr, -set up a homestead claim to a portion of the land upon which foreclosure was sought. The case was tried before a jury, and a peremptory instruction given in appellees’ favor, in accordance wherewith verdict was returned and judgment rendered.

Appellants’ only assignment of error complains of the court’s action in giving the peremptory instruction, it being asserted that the evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Equitable Mortgage Co. v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Bohn v. Burton-Lingo Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thames v. ClesiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Kirlicks v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Toole v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Byrne v. Texas Lumber & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Stevens v. Gustine Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API