Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 10, 1924No. 25,048Published
1DissentHarvey, J.
The clash in legal principles here is whether a provision of our constitution is to be rendered meaningless by a rule of evidence. We have on the one hand the provisions of our state constitution:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons and property against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall be inviolate; and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or property to be seized.” (Bill of Rights, § 15.)
And in criminal proceedings, “No person shall be a witness against…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Essgee Co. of China v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hoyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.