Legal Opinion

Wade v. Ringo

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 28, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. This is a suit in equity to set aside a contract for . fraud, etc., in which the trial court, after a full hearing, rendered a decree dismissing the bill on the merits.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. This is a suit in equity to set aside a contract for . fraud, etc., in which the trial court, after a full hearing, rendered a decree dismissing the bill on the merits. Erom that decree the plaintiff appealed in due form. , In rendering judgment on the circuit the trial judge, Hon. E. M. Hughes, delivered the following opinion: “The object of this suit is to rescind and set aside a written contract between plaintiff and defendant, in-which plaintiff transfers and sells to defendant a stock of furniture and other goods .for and in…

1Per curiam

(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)

Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.

Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. CookeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Wolf v. St. Louis Public Service CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Younger v. HogeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Champion Funding & Foundry Co. v. HeskettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API