Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Hopley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 24, 1929No. 39674Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The note sued on is in ordinary form, dated and payable at Atlantic, Iowa, names plaintiff (J. R. Plunkett) as payee, and is signed by the defendant. Defendant, admitting he signed the note, alleges that it was given for a policy of insurance upon his life, and was secured by misrepresentation, on discovering which he rescinded the contract. The only evidence in the case is the note, and plaintiff’s statement in testimony that it was given for premium on a life insurance policy issued and delivered to defendant. Defendant moved for, and obtained, a directed verdict, on the ground that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meaker Galvanizing Co. v. Charles E. McInnes & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Langworthy v. GardingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Northrup v. A. G. Wills Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Cook v. WeirmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. PrudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API