Thompson v. Goldman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall from the roof of the defendant’s apartment house. The jury returned a money verdict for the plaintiff. Upon the defendant’s motion, the court en banc entered judgment n.o.v. for the defendant on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to establish causative negligence on the part of the defendant and that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The plaintiff has appealed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, the material facts are as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Good v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kovalish v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Francis C. O'Neill and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States v. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation, Third-Party Francis C. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Angelo v. DiamontoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Seewagen v. VanderkluetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Fahringer v. RinehimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.