Legal Opinion
Durham v. United Companies Financial Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 13, 1998No. 24813PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals holding the 30-day notice period in S.C.Code Ann. § 12-49-300 (Supp.1997) must be given before the end of the redemption period. Durham v. United Companies Financial Corp., 326 S.C. 403, 483 S.E.2d 786 (Ct.App.1997). We reverse.
FACTS
In 1988, respondent Carl M. Durham (Durham) purchased real property located in West Columbia from third-party plaintiff/respondent United Companies Financial Corporation (United). Durham gave United a promissory note and mortgage. The mortgage permitted United…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Osborne v. VallentineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Von Elbrecht v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Durham v. United Companies Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Georgia-Carolina Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.