Legal Opinion

Doe Ex Dem. Slaughter v. Roe Ex Dem. W. M. Carney Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 1930No. 1 Div. 553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is a common-law action of ejectment to recover possession of the following described lands,.to wit: “Section 37, Township '2 North, Range 3 East, and Section 38, Township 2 North, Range 2 East” — situated in Baldwin county, Ala.

The defendants disclaimed possession of so much of the land sued for as lies north of Major’s creek and west of the- east line of what is known as the Killingsworth grant, said grant being section 51 .in township 2, north of range 2 east, and as to the remainder of said land pleaded not guilty.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the court directed a verdict for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Doe ex dem. Farmer's Heirs v. EslavaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  5. Barker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morris v. YanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Wiley v. MurphreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ritter v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Goodwyn v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API