Legal Opinion

Brossard v. Durst

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1960No. 37,907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Proceedings for dissolution of School District No. 5 of Dodge County were instituted pursuant to M. S. A. 1953, § 122.28,1 by petition *411signed by all resident freeholders of the district, some 32 in number. The petition provided space where its signers might designate the adjacent school district to which each desired the lands of School District No. 5 to be attached in the event of dissolution. Sixteen signers indicated a preference for School District No. 90, subsequently designated Independent Consolidated School District No. 204, situated partly in Dodge County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. In Re Dissolution of Independent School District No. 27Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. In re Independent Consolidated School District No. 16Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brossard v. DurstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. In Re Dissolution and Distribution of School Dist. No. 5Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API