Legal Opinion

Hemminger v. Klaprath

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 26, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neutze, C. P. J.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant, rendered before one of the Justice of Peace Courts in Camden county, the defendant appeals. The facts in the appeal are stipulated and are not in dispute.

It appears that as of February 7th, 1934, the plaintiff, Edward F. Hemminger, was the owner of a house which was encumbered by a first mortgage held by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The defendant occupied the premises as the tenant of the plaintiff, on a month to month ten- ■ ancy and paid the plaintiff the sum of $30 a month payable in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Paramount B. L. v. SacksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Bermes v. KelleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. Del-New Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Bevill, Bresler & Schulman AssetDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  2. Hyde v. BrandlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Cohen v. Army Moral Support FundDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  4. World Traditions, Inc. v. DeBellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API